TECH & SPACE
🇬🇧
Povratak
🇬🇧 EN
Umjetna inteligencijadb#2694

Generativna AI u igrama: hype bez igre

(7h ago)
San Francisco, United States
cnet.com
Generativna AI u igrama: hype bez igre

Generativna AI u igrama: hype bez igre📷 © Tech&Space

  • ★Googleov Gemini na GDC 2026 bez jasne pobjede
  • ★52% developera vjeruje da AI šteti industriji
  • ★Nvidia DLSS 5 izazvao backlash zbog izmjena bez dopuštenja

Google je na GDC 2026 predstavio igre pogonjene Gemini modelom, ali industrija i dalje čeka 'must-have' slučaj upotrebe koji bi uvjerio igrače i developere. Brojke iz izvještaja GDC State of the Game Industry otkrivaju rascjep: 52% kompanija koristi generativnu ai, ali samo 36% developera je primjenjuje u svakodnevnom radu.

Većina se služi alatom za istraživanje (81%) i pisanje e-mailova (47%), a ne za stvaranje sadržaja — što je upravo ono što je industrijski hype obećavao. Nvidia je s DLSS 5 dodatno zagorčala situaciju, nudeći ai poboljšanja modela likova bez konzultacija s originalnim autorima.

Backlash je bio trenutak: igrači i developeri vidjeli su to kao narušavanje kreativnog integriteta, a ne kao tehnološki napredak. Chris Hays iz id Softwarea usporedio je ai s webom: 'Ako je stvarno revolucionarno, ljudi bi ga sami tražili.' Umjesto toga, industrijski skepticizam raste — 52% developera vjeruje da ai šteti industriji, što je porast od 22 boda u godini dana. Problem nije nedostatak tehnologije, već nedostatak problema koje ai rješava.

Sherveen Uduwana iz United Videogame Workers ističe da ai generirani sadržaj često zahtijeva toliko ljudskih ispravki da bi se mogao stvoriti i bez ai-a.

Demo nasuprot deploymenta: tko plaća račun za AI eksperimente

Demo nasuprot deploymenta: tko plaća račun za AI eksperimente📷 © Tech&Space

Demo nasuprot deploymenta: tko plaća račun za AI eksperimente

Hype oko generativne ai u igrama podsjeća na ranije tehnološke valove: blockchain, NFT, pa čak i cloud gaming. Svaki je obećavao revoluciju, ali rijetki su preživjeli susret s stvarnošću.

Razlika s ai-om je u tome što je tehnologija dovoljno zrela da se ugradi u alate, ali nedovoljno inteligentna da zamijeni ljudski rad. Izvještaj iz GDC-a pokazuje da developeri koriste ai za pomoćne zadatke, a ne za stvaranje jezgre igre — što je upravo ono što je Google demonstrirao s Geminijem. Pravi signal ovdje nije tehnologija, već tko kontrolira njezin razvoj.

Nvidia i Google guraju ai kao rješenje za sve, ali developeri i igrači vide drugu stranu medalje: gubitak kreativne kontrole, povećanu potrebu za nadzorom i neizvjesnost oko autorskih prava. Ako ai postane standard, tko će biti odgovoran za greške?

Tko će posjedovati generirani sadržaj? Pitanja ostaju otvorena, a industrija se pita je li cijena prihvatljiva.

Za sada, jedini siguran dobitnik su kompanije koje prodaju ai alate. Developeri plaćaju licencije, igrači dobivaju neprovjereni sadržaj, a hype se nastavlja.

Stvarna priča nije u tome što ai može, već u tome što industrija ne smije dopustiti da učini. Industrija mora biti svjesna potencijalnih rizika i ograničenja ai-a. Tek tako možemo očekivati da će se ai razvijati na način koji će biti koristan za sve.

Generative AI in gamingAI experiment monetizationDemo vs. deployment gapVideo game industry AI adoptionCost of AI integration

//Comments

Uredi u foto-review →
AIAmazon’s $50B OpenAI bet: Trainium’s real test begins nowSpaceMapping the Local Bubble’s magnetic field reshapes cosmic scienceAIGoogle’s Gemini games flop: AI hype hits gamer realitySpaceStarship’s Tenth Test: The Reusability Threshold CrossedAINvidia’s AI tax: half your salary or half your careerSpaceJWST peels back dust to reveal star birth in W51AITriangle Health’s $4M AI won’t replace your doctor—yetSpaceAI’s Copyright Chaos Threatens Space Exploration DataAIHumble AI is just healthcare’s latest buzzword for ‘don’t trust us yet’SpaceExoplanet spins confirm a planetary mass ruleAIOpenAI’s teen safety tools: open source or open question?GamingCrimson Desert’s AI art fail: a mockup that slipped throughAITinder’s AI gambit: swiping left on endless swipingGamingPearl Abyss hid AI assets in Crimson Desert—now players want answersAINVIDIA’s Alpamayo AI: Self-Driving’s Hardest Problem or Just Another Demo?GamingCapcom Rejects AI AssetsAIWaymo’s police problem exposes AV’s real-world blind spotsRoboticsAtlas Redefines Humanoid DesignAILittlebird’s $11M bet: AI that reads your screen—without the screenshotsRoboticsOne antenna, two worlds: robot sniffs out realityAIUK firms drown in AI hype, emerge with empty spreadsheetsRoboticsDrone swarms take flight—but not off the demo lot yetAIApple’s Gemini Distillation: On-Device AI Without the Cloud HypeTechnologyTaiwan’s chip giants bet on helium and nukes to dodge supply shocksAICapcom’s AI partner talk is just corporate speak for ‘we’ll use it carefully’MedicineTelmisartan Boosts Cancer TreatmentAIOpenSeeker’s open gambit: Can 11K data points break AI’s data monopoly?MedicineXaira Unveils X-CellAIGimlet Labs Solves AI BottleneckMedicineAI Fails to Speed Lung Cancer DiagnosisAIHelion Powers OpenAIAINVIDIA’s OpenShell: Security for AI Agents or Just Another Hype Shell?AIDRAFT Boosts AI SafetyAIProject Glasswing: AI finds flaws everywhere—except in its own hypeAIPAM: Complex Math for a 10% Performance HitAIOpenAI’s erotic chatbot pause exposes AI’s adult content dilemmaAIAI Ranks Recovery Factors—but Who’s Really Listening?AIDeepMind’s AI safety play: real guardrails or just another demo?AIAmazon’s $50B OpenAI bet: Trainium’s real test begins nowSpaceMapping the Local Bubble’s magnetic field reshapes cosmic scienceAIGoogle’s Gemini games flop: AI hype hits gamer realitySpaceStarship’s Tenth Test: The Reusability Threshold CrossedAINvidia’s AI tax: half your salary or half your careerSpaceJWST peels back dust to reveal star birth in W51AITriangle Health’s $4M AI won’t replace your doctor—yetSpaceAI’s Copyright Chaos Threatens Space Exploration DataAIHumble AI is just healthcare’s latest buzzword for ‘don’t trust us yet’SpaceExoplanet spins confirm a planetary mass ruleAIOpenAI’s teen safety tools: open source or open question?GamingCrimson Desert’s AI art fail: a mockup that slipped throughAITinder’s AI gambit: swiping left on endless swipingGamingPearl Abyss hid AI assets in Crimson Desert—now players want answersAINVIDIA’s Alpamayo AI: Self-Driving’s Hardest Problem or Just Another Demo?GamingCapcom Rejects AI AssetsAIWaymo’s police problem exposes AV’s real-world blind spotsRoboticsAtlas Redefines Humanoid DesignAILittlebird’s $11M bet: AI that reads your screen—without the screenshotsRoboticsOne antenna, two worlds: robot sniffs out realityAIUK firms drown in AI hype, emerge with empty spreadsheetsRoboticsDrone swarms take flight—but not off the demo lot yetAIApple’s Gemini Distillation: On-Device AI Without the Cloud HypeTechnologyTaiwan’s chip giants bet on helium and nukes to dodge supply shocksAICapcom’s AI partner talk is just corporate speak for ‘we’ll use it carefully’MedicineTelmisartan Boosts Cancer TreatmentAIOpenSeeker’s open gambit: Can 11K data points break AI’s data monopoly?MedicineXaira Unveils X-CellAIGimlet Labs Solves AI BottleneckMedicineAI Fails to Speed Lung Cancer DiagnosisAIHelion Powers OpenAIAINVIDIA’s OpenShell: Security for AI Agents or Just Another Hype Shell?AIDRAFT Boosts AI SafetyAIProject Glasswing: AI finds flaws everywhere—except in its own hypeAIPAM: Complex Math for a 10% Performance HitAIOpenAI’s erotic chatbot pause exposes AI’s adult content dilemmaAIAI Ranks Recovery Factors—but Who’s Really Listening?AIDeepMind’s AI safety play: real guardrails or just another demo?
⊞ Foto Review